Benchmarking Buildings Based on Their Energy Performance in Kerala: A Case Study of Kochi

Dhilon Subramanian

World Resources Institute India, Thrissur, India
Corresponding Author:Dhilon.Subramanian@wri.org

Sumedha Malaviya

World Resources Institute India, Thrissur, India

Bharath Jairaj

WRI India, Chennai, India

Cite this article

Subramanian, D., Malaviya, S., Jairaj, B. (2024). Benchmarking Buildings Based on Their Energy Performance in Kerala: A Case Study of Kochi. In Proceedings of Energise 2023- Lifestyle, Energy Efficiency, and Climate Action, pp 76–83, Alliance for an Energy Efficient Economy. https://doi.org/10.62576/YAZJ7513

Highlights

  • Globally, countries are committing to decarbonizing their building stock. Achieving climate mitigation targets requires an understanding of the efficiency levels of existing buildings. Energy performance benchmarking helps establish baseline efficiencies and provides policymakers, building portfolio owners, and managers with the information they need to design and implement building efficiency programs.
  • We tested a novel benchmarking methodology for offices in Kochi to understand the availability of data and practical challenges if benchmarking were to be scaled up.
  • For each office, we derived a Building Performance Index (BPI) using statistical regression techniques. Twenty-two offices out of 50 had a BPI < 1 or were relatively more efficient than other offices. We also observed an average Energy Performance Index (EPI) of 130 kilowatt-hours per square meter per year (kWh/m2/year) for sample office buildings, with EPI values ranging from 21.3 to 441.7 kWh/m2/year.
  • Through a qualitative survey, we documented perceptions of the importance of energy efficiency (EE) services in offices of varying ownership and management structures. There were no significant differences in the attitudes and perceptions of owner- and tenant-occupied offices.
  • City-level benchmarking can be done in India with minimum data by supporting back-end statistical analysis resources and tools. The benchmarking methodology we have adopted in this study could guide such efforts at national and subnational levels. We recommend India take a more institutional approach to benchmark energy performance.

Abstract

Many developed countries regularly conduct building energy use benchmarking for continuous monitoring and evaluation of energy efficiency (EE) programs and policies to inform the design of new ones. Such activities also provide an opportunity to engage with building owners, tenants, and managers on RE and EE policies and programs. Our study was aimed at developing a methodology for citywide energy benchmarking exercises in India. We tested a novel benchmarking methodology for offices in Kochi to understand the availability of data and practical challenges if benchmarking were to be scaled up. The study was also aimed at documenting barriers to retrofits for different owner-tenant models.

Keywords

Buildings, Energy Efficiency, Benchmarking, Energy Performance

References

  1. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). 2022. “Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero‑emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector” 41. Nairobi
  2. MOSPI (Ministry of Statistics and Program Implementation). 2019. “Energy Statistics 2019.” New Delhi: MOSPI. http://www.mospi.gov.in/sites/default/files/publication_reports/Energy%20Statistics%202019finall.pdf
  3. MOSPI (Ministry of Statistics and Program Implementation). 2019. “Energy Statistics 2019.” New Delhi: MOSPI. http://www.mospi.gov.in/sites/default/files/publication_reports/Energy%20Statistics%202019finall.pdf
  4. KSPB (Kerala State Planning Board). 2020. “Economic Review 2020” Thiruvananthapuram: Kerala https://spb.kerala.gov.in/sites/default/files/2021-01/English-Vol-1_0.pdf
  5. The Hindu: “Net Zero Carbon Kerala campaign begins”2023. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/kerala/net-zero-carbon-kerala-campaignbegins/article66420778.ece
  6. W. Chung, “Review of Building Energy-Use Performance Benchmarking Methodologies.” Applied Energy, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 1470-79, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.11.022
  7. Z. Hart, “The Benefits of Benchmarking Building Performance.” Washington, DC: Institute for Market Transformation, 2015. www.imt.org/wpcontent/uploads/2018/02/PCC_Benefits_of_Benchmarking.pdf
  8. S. Kumar, M. Kamath, A. Deshmukh, S. Sarraf, S. Seth, S. Pandita, and A. Walia, “Performance Based Rating and Energy Performance Benchmarking for Commercial Buildings in India.” Presented at BauSIM 2010 in Vienna, Austria, 2010.
  9. S. Sarraf, “Energy Benchmarking and Performance Based Rating for Hospital Buildings in India.” New Delhi: Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation, 2014. www.collective.in/ps/sites/default/files/EnergyBenchmarking-and-Performance-Based-Rating-forHospital.pdf
  10. WRI (World Resources Institute). ”Accelerating Building Efficiency-Eight Actions for Urban Leaders.” Washington, DC, 2016. https://publications.wri.org/buildingefficiency/
  11. S. Kumar, M. Kamath, A. Deshmukh, S. Sarraf, S. Seth, S. Pandita, and A. Walia, “Performance Based Rating and Energy Performance Benchmarking for Commercial Buildings in India.” Presented at BauSIM 2010 in Vienna, Austria, 2010.
  12. S. Sarraf, S. Anand, Y. Shukla, P. Mathew, and R. Singh, “Building Energy Benchmarking in India: An Action Plan for Advancing the State-ofthe Art.” Government Technical Report, LBNL-6939E, 1171348, 2014. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Scientific and Technical Information. https://doi.org/10.2172/1171348
  13. L. Marquez, J. McGregor, and M. Syme, “Barriers to the Adoption of Energy Efficiency Measures for Existing Commercial Buildings,” 36. Victoria, Australia: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), 2012.
  14. L. Marquez, J. McGregor, and M. Syme, “Barriers to the Adoption of Energy Efficiency Measures for Existing Commercial Buildings,” 36. Victoria, Australia: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), 2012.